![]() ![]() This was certainly a dramatic change in Andrew’s strategy and women’s groups reacted with fury accusing him of ‘victim shaming’ and further evidence of the prince’s ‘appalling judgment’.īut in exposing his accuser’s alleged past, even Andrew’s supporters were lamenting the absence, once again, of any apparent sign of remorse in his eleventh hour response to her legal action. It included remarks from a sister of a former boyfriend of Miss Roberts who says she was asked to help recruit underage girls for Epstein. Andrew's lawyers accused Miss Roberts of only suing Andrew in the hope of securing ‘another pay day’Īnyone who calls in ‘evidence’ from a New York tabloid newspaper by way of wreaking vengeance is entitled to have their motives seriously examined.Īnd that is precisely what happened yesterday in the wake of the 36-page motion his legal team submitted to dismiss the civil action brought in the US courts by Virginia Roberts in which she alleges the Duke of York, 61, raped her.Īccompanying this dossier was an article that accused Miss Roberts, 38, of being a ‘money-hungry sex kitten’ and once ‘head bitch’ for paedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |